↓ Skip to main content

Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 27,169)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
Title
Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2018
DOI 10.1056/nejmsa1803972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nishant Kishore, Domingo Marqués, Ayesha Mahmud, Mathew V. Kiang, Irmary Rodriguez, Arlan Fuller, Peggy Ebner, Cecilia Sorensen, Fabio Racy, Jay Lemery, Leslie Maas, Jennifer Leaning, Rafael A. Irizarry, Satchit Balsari, Caroline O. Buckee

Abstract

Background Quantifying the effect of natural disasters on society is critical for recovery of public health services and infrastructure. The death toll can be difficult to assess in the aftermath of a major disaster. In September 2017, Hurricane Maria caused massive infrastructural damage to Puerto Rico, but its effect on mortality remains contentious. The official death count is 64. Methods Using a representative, stratified sample, we surveyed 3299 randomly chosen households across Puerto Rico to produce an independent estimate of all-cause mortality after the hurricane. Respondents were asked about displacement, infrastructure loss, and causes of death. We calculated excess deaths by comparing our estimated post-hurricane mortality rate with official rates for the same period in 2016. Results From the survey data, we estimated a mortality rate of 14.3 deaths (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8 to 18.9) per 1000 persons from September 20 through December 31, 2017. This rate yielded a total of 4645 excess deaths during this period (95% CI, 793 to 8498), equivalent to a 62% increase in the mortality rate as compared with the same period in 2016. However, this number is likely to be an underestimate because of survivor bias. The mortality rate remained high through the end of December 2017, and one third of the deaths were attributed to delayed or interrupted health care. Hurricane-related migration was substantial. Conclusions This household-based survey suggests that the number of excess deaths related to Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico is more than 70 times the official estimate. (Funded by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and others.).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12,506 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 450 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 16%
Researcher 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 11%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 60 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 64 14%
Environmental Science 45 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 10%
Engineering 37 8%
Psychology 30 7%
Other 144 32%
Unknown 86 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10447. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2020.
All research outputs
#51
of 15,637,225 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#6
of 27,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 281,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,637,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 81.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.