You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardizing an approach to the evaluation of implementation science proposals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0770-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erika L. Crable, Dea Biancarelli, Allan J. Walkey, Caitlin G. Allen, Enola K. Proctor, Mari-Lynn Drainoni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 28% |
| Australia | 9 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 34 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 22 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#863,992
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#91
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,635
of 345,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.