You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Gut, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kentaro Sugano, Jan Tack, Ernst J Kuipers, David Y Graham, Emad M El-Omar, Soichiro Miura, Ken Haruma, Masahiro Asaka, Naomi Uemura, Peter Malfertheiner, Takeshi Azuma, Franco Bazzoli, Francis Ka-Leung Chan, Minhu Chen, Naoki Chiba, Tsutomu Chiba, Luiz Gonzaga Vas Coelho, Francesco Di Mario, Kwong Ming Fock, Yasuhiro Fukuda, Takahisa Furuta, Robert Maximilian Genta, Khean-Lee Goh, Masanori Ito, Peter Harry Katelaris, Mototsugu Kato, Takashi Kawai, Nayoung Kim, Ryuji Kushima, Varocha Mahachai, Takeshi Matsuhisa, Francis Mégraud, Hiroto Miwa, Kazunari Murakami, Colm Antoine O'Morain, Massimo Rugge, Kiichi Sato, Tadashi Shimoyama, Akiko Shiotani, Toshiro Sugiyama, Kazuyoshi Yagi, Ming-Shiang Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 17 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
United States | 5 | 7% |
Mexico | 3 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 22 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 15% |
Scientists | 8 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 862 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 854 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 107 | 12% |
Researcher | 81 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 71 | 8% |
Student > Master | 68 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 8% |
Other | 191 | 22% |
Unknown | 279 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 363 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 3% |
Other | 68 | 8% |
Unknown | 296 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#626,610
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#360
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,584
of 259,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#5
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.