↓ Skip to main content

Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
67 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1361 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
862 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis
Published in
Gut, July 2015
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kentaro Sugano, Jan Tack, Ernst J Kuipers, David Y Graham, Emad M El-Omar, Soichiro Miura, Ken Haruma, Masahiro Asaka, Naomi Uemura, Peter Malfertheiner, Takeshi Azuma, Franco Bazzoli, Francis Ka-Leung Chan, Minhu Chen, Naoki Chiba, Tsutomu Chiba, Luiz Gonzaga Vas Coelho, Francesco Di Mario, Kwong Ming Fock, Yasuhiro Fukuda, Takahisa Furuta, Robert Maximilian Genta, Khean-Lee Goh, Masanori Ito, Peter Harry Katelaris, Mototsugu Kato, Takashi Kawai, Nayoung Kim, Ryuji Kushima, Varocha Mahachai, Takeshi Matsuhisa, Francis Mégraud, Hiroto Miwa, Kazunari Murakami, Colm Antoine O'Morain, Massimo Rugge, Kiichi Sato, Tadashi Shimoyama, Akiko Shiotani, Toshiro Sugiyama, Kazuyoshi Yagi, Ming-Shiang Wu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 862 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Unknown 854 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 107 12%
Researcher 81 9%
Student > Postgraduate 71 8%
Student > Master 68 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 8%
Other 191 22%
Unknown 279 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 363 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 3%
Other 68 8%
Unknown 296 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#626,610
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#360
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,584
of 259,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#5
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.