You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What would Karl Popper say? Are current psychological theories of ADHD falsifiable?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-5-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Katherine A Johnson, Jan R Wiersema, Jonna Kuntsi |
Abstract |
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common and highly heritable neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorder. Here, we critically review four major psychological theories of ADHD - the Executive Dysfunction, the State Regulation, the Delay Aversion and the Dynamic Developmental - on their abilities to explain all the symptoms of ADHD, their testability and their openness to falsification. We conclude that theoreticians should focus, to a greater extent than currently practiced, on developing refutable theories of ADHD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Belgium | 2 | <1% |
Israel | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 244 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 53 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 10% |
Researcher | 21 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
Other | 51 | 19% |
Unknown | 48 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 136 | 52% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 8% |
Unknown | 57 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,762,906
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#56
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,913
of 109,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.