You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Novel Mouse Model for Non-Invasive Single Marker Tracking of Mammary Stem Cells In Vivo Reveals Stem Cell Dynamics throughout Pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin J. Tiede, Leah A. Owens, Feng Li, Christina DeCoste, Yibin Kang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,883
of 196,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,869
of 167,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#283
of 546 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 546 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.