↓ Skip to main content

Ancient ancestry informative markers for identifying fine-scale ancient population structure in Eurasians

Overview of attention for article published in bioRxiv, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ancient ancestry informative markers for identifying fine-scale ancient population structure in Eurasians
Published in
bioRxiv, May 2018
DOI 10.1101/333690
Authors

Umberto Esposito, Ranajit Das, Mehdi Pirooznia, Eran Elhaik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,003,637
of 11,489,354 outputs
Outputs from bioRxiv
#9,678
of 29,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,397
of 226,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from bioRxiv
#1,322
of 5,370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,489,354 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.