↓ Skip to main content

Expanding the threonine aldolase toolbox for the asymmetric synthesis of tertiary α-amino acids

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Expanding the threonine aldolase toolbox for the asymmetric synthesis of tertiary α-amino acids
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00253-015-6803-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kateryna Fesko, Gernot A. Strohmeier, Rolf Breinbauer

Abstract

The direct biochemical synthesis of tertiary α-amino acids with a wide range of diversity was recently reported using natural threonine aldolases LTA from Aeromonas jandei and DTA from Pseudomonas sp. Here, we describe the identification of five novel threonine aldolases which accept alanine and serine as amino acid donors. The enzymes were found by sequence database analysis using known aldolases as template. All enzymes were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and purified, and their biochemical properties were characterized. The new enantiocomplementary L- and D-threonine aldolases catalyze the asymmetric synthesis of β-hydroxy α-methyl- and α-hydroxymethyl-α-amino acids with good conversion and perfect enantioselectivity at α-carbon of the products (e.e. >99 %). The structural basis for the broad donor specificity of these threonine aldolases is analyzed based on crystal structure alignments and amino acid sequences comparison.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Unspecified 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,371,088
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,817
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,522
of 268,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#71
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.