↓ Skip to main content

Microneedle Array Design Determines the Induction of Protective Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses Induced by a Recombinant Live Malaria Vaccine in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microneedle Array Design Determines the Induction of Protective Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses Induced by a Recombinant Live Malaria Vaccine in Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022442
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B. Carey, Frances E. Pearson, Anto Vrdoljak, Marie G. McGrath, Abina M. Crean, Patrick T. Walsh, Timothy Doody, Conor O'Mahony, Adrian V. S. Hill, Anne C. Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Pakistan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 16%
Engineering 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#7,567,797
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,883
of 196,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,611
of 120,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#966
of 2,262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.