↓ Skip to main content

Microneedle Array Design Determines the Induction of Protective Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses Induced by a Recombinant Live Malaria Vaccine in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microneedle Array Design Determines the Induction of Protective Memory CD8+ T Cell Responses Induced by a Recombinant Live Malaria Vaccine in Mice
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022442
Pubmed ID
Authors

John B. Carey, Frances E. Pearson, Anto Vrdoljak, Marie G. McGrath, Abina M. Crean, Patrick T. Walsh, Timothy Doody, Conor O'Mahony, Adrian V. S. Hill, Anne C. Moore

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Pakistan 1 1%
France 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 15%
Engineering 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 19 26%
Unknown 6 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,692,486
of 20,582,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,510
of 177,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,088
of 297,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,137
of 2,261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,582,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.