Title |
Phenolic indeno[1,2-b]indoles as ABCG2-selective potent and non-toxic inhibitors stimulating basal ATPase activity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s84982 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gustavo Jabor Gozzi, Zouhair Bouaziz, Evelyn Winter, Nathalia Daflon-Yunes, Mylène Honorat, Nathalie Guragossian, Christelle Marminon, Glaucio Valdameri, Andre Bollacke, Jean Guillon, Noël Pinaud, Mathieu Marchivie, Silvia M Cadena, Joachim Jose, Marc Le Borgne, Attilio Di Pietro |
Abstract |
Ketonic indeno[1,2-b]indole-9,10-dione derivatives, initially designed as human casein kinase II (CK2) inhibitors, were recently shown to be converted into efficient inhibitors of drug efflux by the breast cancer resistance protein ABCG2 upon suited substitutions including a N (5)-phenethyl on C-ring and hydrophobic groups on D-ring. A series of ten phenolic and seven p-quinonic derivatives were synthesized and screened for inhibition of both CK2 and ABCG2 activities. The best phenolic inhibitors were about threefold more potent against ABCG2 than the corresponding ketonic derivatives, and showed low cytotoxicity. They were selective for ABCG2 over both P-glycoprotein and MRP1 (multidrug resistance protein 1), whereas the ketonic derivatives also interacted with MRP1, and they additionally displayed a lower interaction with CK2. Quite interestingly, they strongly stimulated ABCG2 ATPase activity, in contrast to ketonic derivatives, suggesting distinct binding sites. In contrast, the p-quinonic indenoindoles were cytotoxic and poor ABCG2 inhibitors, whereas a partial inhibition recovery could be reached upon hydrophobic substitutions on D-ring, similarly to the ketonic derivatives. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 17% |
Chemistry | 5 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |