↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic diversity of Amazonian tree communities
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, July 2015
DOI 10.1111/ddi.12357
Authors

Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Kyle G. Dexter, R. Toby Pennington, Jérôme Chave, Simon L. Lewis, Miguel N. Alexiades, Esteban Alvarez, Atila Alves de Oliveira, Iêda L. Amaral, Alejandro Araujo-Murakami, Eric J. M. M. Arets, Gerardo A. Aymard, Christopher Baraloto, Damien Bonal, Roel Brienen, Carlos Cerón, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Anthony Di Fiore, William Farfan-Rios, Ted R. Feldpausch, Niro Higuchi, Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Susan G. Laurance, William F. Laurance, Gabriela López-Gonzalez, Beatriz S. Marimon, Ben Hur Marimon-Junior, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, David Neill, Walter Palacios Cuenca, Maria Cristina Peñuela Mora, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Adriana Prieto, Carlos A. Quesada, Hirma Ramirez Angulo, Agustín Rudas, Ademir R. Ruschel, Norma Salinas Revilla, Rafael P. Salomão, Ana Segalin de Andrade, Miles R. Silman, Wilson Spironello, Hans ter Steege, John Terborgh, Marisol Toledo, Luis Valenzuela Gamarra, Ima C. G. Vieira, Emilio Vilanova Torre, Vincent Vos, Oliver L. Phillips

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 3%
Colombia 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 205 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 19%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 55%
Environmental Science 39 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 41 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,436,098
of 12,819,049 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#313
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,921
of 234,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.