You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Cetuximab to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0038557 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Malek B. Hannouf, Chander Sehgal, Jeffrey Q. Cao, Joseph D. Mocanu, Eric Winquist, Gregory S. Zaric |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 25% |
Researcher | 13 | 25% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 45% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 14% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,772,511
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,124
of 196,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,769
of 164,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#977
of 3,922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.