↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Capacity-Building Activities for Forest Measurement, Reporting, and Verification, 2011–15

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Capacity-Building Activities for Forest Measurement, Reporting, and Verification, 2011–15
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/ofr20181031
Authors

Peneva-Reed, Elitsa I., Romijn, J. Erika , Elitsa I. Peneva-Reed, J. Erika Romijn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,358,475
of 13,046,126 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#418
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,995
of 271,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#34
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,046,126 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.