↓ Skip to main content

Anticipating Environmental and Environmental-Health Implications of Extreme Storms: ARkStorm Scenario

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards Review, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 217)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anticipating Environmental and Environmental-Health Implications of Extreme Storms: ARkStorm Scenario
Published in
Natural Hazards Review, November 2016
DOI 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000188
Authors

Geoffrey S. Plumlee, Charles N. Alpers, Suzette A. Morman, Carma San Juan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 25%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 16%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#877,822
of 18,783,186 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards Review
#17
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,757
of 243,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,783,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them