↓ Skip to main content

Gender, sexuality and the discursive representation of access and equity in health services literature: implications for LGBT communities

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender, sexuality and the discursive representation of access and equity in health services literature: implications for LGBT communities
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-10-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea E Daley, Judith A MacDonnell

Abstract

This article considers how health services access and equity documents represent the problem of access to health services and what the effects of that representation might be for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) communities. We conducted a critical discourse analysis on selected access and equity documents using a gender-based diversity framework as determined by two objectives: 1) to identify dominant and counter discourses in health services access and equity literature; and 2) to develop understanding of how particular discourses impact the inclusion, or not, of LGBT communities in health services access and equity frameworks.The analysis was conducted in response to public health and clinical research that has documented barriers to health services access for LGBT communities including institutionalized heterosexism, biphobia, and transphobia, invisibility and lack of health provider knowledge and comfort. The analysis was also conducted as the first step of exploring LGBT access issues in home care services for LGBT populations in Ontario, Canada.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 178 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 51 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Psychology 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#916
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,834
of 143,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.