You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enzymatically Generated CRISPR Libraries for Genome Labeling and Screening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Developmental Cell, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew B. Lane, Magdalena Strzelecka, Andreas Ettinger, Andrew W. Grenfell, Torsten Wittmann, Rebecca Heald |
| Abstract |
CRISPR-based technologies have emerged as powerful tools to alter genomes and mark chromosomal loci, but an inexpensive method for generating large numbers of RNA guides for whole genome screening and labeling is lacking. Using a method that permits library construction from any source of DNA, we generated guide libraries that label repetitive loci or a single chromosomal locus in Xenopus egg extracts and show that a complex library can target the E. coli genome at high frequency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 38% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 53% |
| Scientists | 14 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 118 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 68 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#873,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Cell
#371
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,477
of 275,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Cell
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.