You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DISCOVERY AND VALIDATION OF Kepler-452b: A 1.6 R⨁ SUPER EARTH EXOPLANET IN THE HABITABLE ZONE OF A G2 STAR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Astronomical Journal, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1088/0004-6256/150/2/56 |
| Authors |
Jon M. Jenkins, Joseph D. Twicken, Natalie M. Batalha, Douglas A. Caldwell, William D. Cochran, Michael Endl, David W. Latham, Gilbert A. Esquerdo, Shawn Seader, Allyson Bieryla, Erik Petigura, David R. Ciardi, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Howard Isaacson, Daniel Huber, Jason F. Rowe, Guillermo Torres, Stephen T. Bryson, Lars Buchhave, Ivan Ramirez, Angie Wolfgang, Jie Li, Jennifer R. Campbell, Peter Tenenbaum, Dwight Sanderfer, Christopher E. Henze, Joseph H. Catanzarite, Ronald L. Gilliland, William J. Borucki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Thailand | 5 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 2% |
| Saint Lucia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 79% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 62 | 53% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#166,288
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from The Astronomical Journal
#168
of 8,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,619
of 275,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Astronomical Journal
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.