↓ Skip to main content

Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme
Published in
European Radiology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00330-018-5420-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Ward, S. Heller, S. Hudson, L. Wilkinson

Abstract

To assess patterns of parenchymal tissue on mammography in women with dense breasts and to determine how this varies with age and affects recall to assessment and cancer diagnosis. Breast density data was obtained in women attending routine mammographic screening from April 2013 to March 2015 using automated breast density assessment software. Women with the densest breasts were selected for visual interpretation of parenchymal pattern (PP). One hundred non-assessed women, aged 50, 55, 60, 65 and 69-71 years (total = 500), provided controls. Cases included women recalled for assessment (mastectomy or implants excluded) (total = 280). Mammograms reviewed by ten readers and PP classified as: (1) very smooth; (2) mainly smooth; (3) mixed; (4) mainly nodular; (5) very nodular. The ratio of women in each category at each age and screening outcomes were compared by Pearson's chi-squared test. Reader agreement for scoring PP was good (intraclass correlation = 0.6302). Proportions of women in each PP category were similar at all ages for controls (p = 0.147) and cases (p = 0.657). The ratio of PP categories did not vary significantly with age in those who underwent biopsy (p = 0.484). Thirty-four cancers were diagnosed. There was a significant correlation between a diagnosis of cancer and nodular PP compared to not nodular PP (p = 0.043). The ratio of smooth to nodular pattern in women with the densest breasts did not vary with age. The PP of the breast tissue did not affect likelihood of recall to assessment or biopsy. There was a significant relationship between a nodular parenchymal pattern and diagnosis of cancer. • This paper shows that there is good agreement between mammogram readers when classifying mammographic PP on a five-point scale from very smooth to very nodular. • In non-assessed women with the densest breasts, there is no significant change in the proportions of smooth to nodular patterns with increasing age. • The likelihood of recall for further assessment or biopsy at assessment is not related to PP in women with highest breast density. • When recalled for further assessment, significantly more women are diagnosed with cancer in the group with nodular PP on mammography when compared with smooth and mixed patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Computer Science 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#12,780,870
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,853
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,149
of 330,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#30
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.