↓ Skip to main content

Hybridization rapidly reduces fitness of a native trout in the wild

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybridization rapidly reduces fitness of a native trout in the wild
Published in
Biology Letters, March 2009
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clint C. Muhlfeld, Steven T. Kalinowski, Thomas E. McMahon, Mark L. Taper, Sally Painter, Robb F. Leary, Fred W. Allendorf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 234 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 27%
Student > Master 47 19%
Researcher 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Unspecified 17 7%
Other 61 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 164 65%
Environmental Science 41 16%
Unspecified 24 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 10 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,165,694
of 12,061,875 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#1,951
of 2,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,447
of 237,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#63
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,061,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.