↓ Skip to main content

Five-Year Prognosis in an Incident Cohort of People Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Five-Year Prognosis in an Incident Cohort of People Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin R. Simpson, Brian S. Buckley, David J. McLernon, Aziz Sheikh, Andrew Murphy, Philip C. Hannaford

Abstract

Following an AMI, it is important for patients and their physicians to appreciate the subsequent risk of death, and the potential benefits of invasive cardiac procedures and secondary preventive therapy. Studies, to-date, have focused largely on high-risk populations. We wished to determine the risk of death in a population-derived cohort of 2,887 patients after a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Decision Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,065,665
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#56,536
of 164,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,333
of 120,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#761
of 2,125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 164,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.