You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applied Climate-Change Analysis: The Climate Wizard Tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Evan H. Girvetz, Chris Zganjar, George T. Raber, Edwin P. Maurer, Peter Kareiva, Joshua J. Lawler |
| Abstract |
Although the message of "global climate change" is catalyzing international action, it is local and regional changes that directly affect people and ecosystems and are of immediate concern to scientists, managers, and policy makers. A major barrier preventing informed climate-change adaptation planning is the difficulty accessing, analyzing, and interpreting climate-change information. To address this problem, we developed a powerful, yet easy to use, web-based tool called Climate Wizard (http://ClimateWizard.org) that provides non-climate specialists with simple analyses and innovative graphical depictions for conveying how climate has and is projected to change within specific geographic areas throughout the world. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 358 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 110 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 22% |
| Unknown | 44 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 137 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 9% |
| Engineering | 19 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,566,379
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,009
of 202,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,946
of 168,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#69
of 601 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 601 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.