You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teaching Bioinformatics at the Secondary School Level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002242 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fran Lewitter, Philip E. Bourne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Brazil | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,962,864
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,715
of 8,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,099
of 152,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#47
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.