The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Purification and Characterization of Nipah Virus Nucleocapsid Protein Produced in Insect Cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, July 2005
|
DOI | 10.1128/jcm.43.7.3172-3177.2005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Majid Eshaghi, Wen Siang Tan, Swee Tin Ong, Khatijah Yusoff |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 37% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2011.
All research outputs
#8,966,384
of 26,437,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#6,568
of 14,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,031
of 69,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Microbiology
#74
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,437,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.