↓ Skip to main content

点鼻用血管収縮薬による薬剤性鼻閉33例の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 234)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
点鼻用血管収縮薬による薬剤性鼻閉33例の検討
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.62.1623
Authors

湯田 厚司, 小川 由起子

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 38%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 88%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#498,141
of 13,927,501 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#2
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,139
of 276,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,927,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them