↓ Skip to main content

Genome-scale identification of transcription factors that mediate an inflammatory network during breast cellular transformation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-scale identification of transcription factors that mediate an inflammatory network during breast cellular transformation
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04406-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhe Ji, Lizhi He, Asaf Rotem, Andreas Janzer, Christine S. Cheng, Aviv Regev, Kevin Struhl

Abstract

Transient activation of Src oncoprotein in non-transformed, breast epithelial cells can initiate an epigenetic switch to the stably transformed state via a positive feedback loop that involves the inflammatory transcription factors STAT3 and NF-κB. Here, we develop an experimental and computational pipeline that includes 1) a Bayesian network model (AccessTF) that accurately predicts protein-bound DNA sequence motifs based on chromatin accessibility, and 2) a scoring system (TFScore) that rank-orders transcription factors as candidates for being important for a biological process. Genetic experiments validate TFScore and suggest that more than 40 transcription factors contribute to the oncogenic state in this model. Interestingly, individual depletion of several of these factors results in similar transcriptional profiles, indicating that a complex and interconnected transcriptional network promotes a stable oncogenic state. The combined experimental and computational pipeline represents a general approach to comprehensively identify transcriptional regulators important for a biological process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 22%
Computer Science 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,237,952
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#34,647
of 47,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,258
of 330,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#936
of 1,237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.