↓ Skip to main content

Ant groups optimally amplify the effect of transiently informed individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Ant groups optimally amplify the effect of transiently informed individuals
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms8729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aviram Gelblum, Itai Pinkoviezky, Ehud Fonio, Abhijit Ghosh, Nir Gov, Ofer Feinerman

Abstract

To cooperatively transport a large load, it is important that carriers conform in their efforts and align their forces. A downside of behavioural conformism is that it may decrease the group's responsiveness to external information. Combining experiment and theory, we show how ants optimize collective transport. On the single-ant scale, optimization stems from decision rules that balance individuality and compliance. Macroscopically, these rules poise the system at the transition between random walk and ballistic motion where the collective response to the steering of a single informed ant is maximized. We relate this peak in response to the divergence of susceptibility at a phase transition. Our theoretical models predict that the ant-load system can be transitioned through the critical point of this mesoscopic system by varying its size; we present experiments supporting these predictions. Our findings show that efficient group-level processes can arise from transient amplification of individual-based knowledge.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,069 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
France 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 209 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 25%
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 14 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 38%
Physics and Astronomy 34 15%
Computer Science 24 11%
Engineering 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 21 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,509
of 14,374,884 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#286
of 26,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324
of 235,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,374,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them