You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environment and host as large-scale controls of ectomycorrhizal fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0189-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sietse van der Linde, Laura M. Suz, C. David L. Orme, Filipa Cox, Henning Andreae, Endla Asi, Bonnie Atkinson, Sue Benham, Christopher Carroll, Nathalie Cools, Bruno De Vos, Hans-Peter Dietrich, Johannes Eichhorn, Joachim Gehrmann, Tine Grebenc, Hyun S. Gweon, Karin Hansen, Frank Jacob, Ferdinand Kristöfel, Paweł Lech, Miklós Manninger, Jan Martin, Henning Meesenburg, Päivi Merilä, Manuel Nicolas, Pavel Pavlenda, Pasi Rautio, Marcus Schaub, Hans-Werner Schröck, Walter Seidling, Vít Šrámek, Anne Thimonier, Iben Margrete Thomsen, Hugues Titeux, Elena Vanguelova, Arne Verstraeten, Lars Vesterdal, Peter Waldner, Sture Wijk, Yuxin Zhang, Daniel Žlindra, Martin I. Bidartondo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 309 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 7% |
| Germany | 12 | 4% |
| France | 11 | 4% |
| India | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 56 | 18% |
| Unknown | 136 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 211 | 68% |
| Scientists | 81 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 446 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 96 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 172 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 95 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Unknown | 129 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 447. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#64,239
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#4,972
of 99,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,366
of 344,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#111
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.