↓ Skip to main content

The science case for the EISCAT_3D radar

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 112)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The science case for the EISCAT_3D radar
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40645-015-0051-8
Authors

Ian McCrea, Anita Aikio, Lucilla Alfonsi, Evgenia Belova, Stephan Buchert, Mark Clilverd, Norbert Engler, Björn Gustavsson, Craig Heinselman, Johan Kero, Mike Kosch, Hervé Lamy, Thomas Leyser, Yasunobu Ogawa, Kjellmar Oksavik, Asta Pellinen-Wannberg, Frederic Pitout, Markus Rapp, Iwona Stanislawska, Juha Vierinen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 19 58%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 18%
Unspecified 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 6 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,779,714
of 7,367,623 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#49
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,776
of 225,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,367,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.