↓ Skip to main content

Paternity of Subordinates Raises Cooperative Effort in Cichlids

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paternity of Subordinates Raises Cooperative Effort in Cichlids
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rick Bruintjes, Danielle Bonfils, Dik Heg, Michael Taborsky

Abstract

In cooperative breeders, subordinates generally help a dominant breeding pair to raise offspring. Parentage studies have shown that in several species subordinates can participate in reproduction. This suggests an important role of direct fitness benefits for cooperation, particularly where groups contain unrelated subordinates. In this situation parentage should influence levels of cooperation. Here we combine parentage analyses and detailed behavioural observations in the field to study whether in the highly social cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher subordinates participate in reproduction and if so, whether and how this affects their cooperative care, controlling for the effect of kinship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 55 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 25%
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 64%
Psychology 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,737
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,222
of 135,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,668
of 2,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.