You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variation in treatment and survival of older patients with non-metastatic breast cancer in five European countries: a population-based cohort study from the EURECCA Breast Cancer Group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41416-018-0090-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marloes G. M. Derks, Esther Bastiaannet, Mandy Kiderlen, Denise E. Hilling, Petra G. Boelens, Paul M. Walsh, Elizabeth van Eycken, Sabine Siesling, John Broggio, Lynda Wyld, Maciej Trojanowski, Agnieszka Kolacinska, Justyna Chalubinska-Fendler, Ana Filipa Gonçalves, Tomasz Nowikiewicz, Wojciech Zegarski, Riccardo A. Audisio, Gerrit-Jan Liefers, Johanneke E. A. Portielje, Cornelis J. H. van de Velde, on behalf of the EURECCA Breast Cancer Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 54% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,007,056
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#329
of 11,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,551
of 346,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#5
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.