↓ Skip to main content

Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Glaciology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,258)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
164 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
498 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
564 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historically unprecedented global glacier decline in the early 21st century
Published in
Journal of Glaciology, July 2017
DOI 10.3189/2015jog15j017
Authors

Michael Zemp, Holger Frey, Isabelle Gärtner-Roer, Samuel U. Nussbaumer, Martin Hoelzle, Frank Paul, Wilfried Haeberli, Florian Denzinger, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Brian Anderson, Samjwal Bajracharya, Carlo Baroni, Ludwig N. Braun, Bolívar E. Cáceres, Gino Casassa, Guillermo Cobos, Luzmila R. Dávila, Hugo Delgado Granados, Michael N. Demuth, Lydia Espizua, Andrea Fischer, Koji Fujita, Bogdan Gadek, Ali Ghazanfar, Jon Ove Hagen, Per Holmlund, Neamat Karimi, Zhongqin Li, Mauri Pelto, Pierre Pitte, Victor V. Popovnin, Cesar A. Portocarrero, Rainer Prinz, Chandrashekhar V. Sangewar, Igor Severskiy, Oddur Sigurđsson, Alvaro Soruco, Ryskul Usubaliev, Christian Vincent

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 546 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 103 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 17%
Student > Master 82 15%
Student > Bachelor 59 10%
Other 26 5%
Other 102 18%
Unknown 97 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 244 43%
Environmental Science 91 16%
Engineering 30 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Other 46 8%
Unknown 125 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 444. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#56,360
of 23,935,525 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Glaciology
#4
of 1,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,332
of 315,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Glaciology
#2
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,935,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.