You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Comprehensive Evaluation of Colonic Mucosal Isolates of Sutterella wadsworthensis from Inflammatory Bowel Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0027076 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Indrani Mukhopadhya, Richard Hansen, Charlotte E. Nicholl, Yazeid A. Alhaidan, John M. Thomson, Susan H. Berry, Craig Pattinson, David A. Stead, Richard K. Russell, Emad M. El-Omar, Georgina L. Hold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,818,526
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,463
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,756
of 157,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#377
of 2,708 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,708 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.