↓ Skip to main content

Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 68,354)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
236 news outlets
blogs
36 blogs
twitter
2032 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017
Published in
Nature, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0179-y
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The Antarctic Ice Sheet is an important indicator of climate change and driver of sea-level rise. Here we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction with modelling of its surface mass balance to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, which corresponds to an increase in mean sea level of 7.6 ± 3.9 millimetres (errors are one standard deviation). Over this period, ocean-driven melting has caused rates of ice loss from West Antarctica to increase from 53 ± 29 billion to 159 ± 26 billion tonnes per year; ice-shelf collapse has increased the rate of ice loss from the Antarctic Peninsula from 7 ± 13 billion to 33 ± 16 billion tonnes per year. We find large variations in and among model estimates of surface mass balance and glacial isostatic adjustment for East Antarctica, with its average rate of mass gain over the period 1992-2017 (5 ± 46 billion tonnes per year) being the least certain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,032 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 19%
Unspecified 31 13%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 114 47%
Unspecified 47 19%
Environmental Science 35 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Physics and Astronomy 10 4%
Other 24 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3378. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#167
of 12,987,514 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35
of 68,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 270,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,987,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.