↓ Skip to main content

Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 69,885)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
236 news outlets
blogs
37 blogs
twitter
2009 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017
Published in
Nature, June 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0179-y
Pubmed ID
Abstract

The Antarctic Ice Sheet is an important indicator of climate change and driver of sea-level rise. Here we combine satellite observations of its changing volume, flow and gravitational attraction with modelling of its surface mass balance to show that it lost 2,720 ± 1,390 billion tonnes of ice between 1992 and 2017, which corresponds to an increase in mean sea level of 7.6 ± 3.9 millimetres (errors are one standard deviation). Over this period, ocean-driven melting has caused rates of ice loss from West Antarctica to increase from 53 ± 29 billion to 159 ± 26 billion tonnes per year; ice-shelf collapse has increased the rate of ice loss from the Antarctic Peninsula from 7 ± 13 billion to 33 ± 16 billion tonnes per year. We find large variations in and among model estimates of surface mass balance and glacial isostatic adjustment for East Antarctica, with its average rate of mass gain over the period 1992-2017 (5 ± 46 billion tonnes per year) being the least certain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,009 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 20%
Unspecified 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 26 9%
Other 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 136 49%
Unspecified 56 20%
Environmental Science 36 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Physics and Astronomy 11 4%
Other 26 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3375. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#194
of 13,534,362 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#43
of 69,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 268,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,534,362 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.