↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension in Pediatric Dialysis Patients: Etiology, Evaluation, and Management

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypertension in Pediatric Dialysis Patients: Etiology, Evaluation, and Management
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11906-018-0857-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raj Munshi, Joseph T. Flynn

Abstract

Review epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of hypertension in the pediatric dialysis population. Interdialytic blood pressure measurement, especially with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, is the gold standard to assess for hypertension. Tools to assess dry weight aid in achievement of euvolemia, the primary therapy for management of hypertension. Persistent hypertension should be treated with antihypertensive medications and potentially with native nephrectomies. Cardiovascular disease continues to be the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in the dialysis population with hypertension as an important modifiable factor. Achievement on dry weight and limiting both aggressiveness of interdialytic weight gain and ultrafiltration rate underlie the best approach. Tools to assess volume status beyond clinical assessment have shown promise in achieving euvolemia. When hypertension persists despite achievement of euvolemia, antihypertensive medications may be required and in some cases native nephrectomies. Future studies in children are needed to determine the best antihypertensive class and ideal rate of ultrafiltration on hemodialysis towards achievement of normotension and reduction of cardiovascular risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,629,132
of 24,288,533 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#212
of 757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,463
of 332,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.