↓ Skip to main content

Secondary metabolites in fungus-plant interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
420 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
863 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Secondary metabolites in fungus-plant interactions
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2015.00573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tünde Pusztahelyi, Imre J. Holb, István Pócsi

Abstract

Fungi and plants are rich sources of thousands of secondary metabolites. The genetically coded possibilities for secondary metabolite production, the stimuli of the production, and the special phytotoxins basically determine the microscopic fungi-host plant interactions and the pathogenic lifestyle of fungi. The review introduces plant secondary metabolites usually with antifungal effect as well as the importance of signaling molecules in induced systemic resistance and systemic acquired resistance processes. The review also concerns the mimicking of plant effector molecules like auxins, gibberellins and abscisic acid by fungal secondary metabolites that modulate plant growth or even can subvert the plant defense responses such as programmed cell death to gain nutrients for fungal growth and colonization. It also looks through the special secondary metabolite production and host selective toxins of some significant fungal pathogens and the plant response in form of phytoalexin production. New results coming from genome and transcriptional analyses in context of selected fungal pathogens and their hosts are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 863 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 856 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 163 19%
Student > Master 125 14%
Student > Bachelor 120 14%
Researcher 102 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 5%
Other 99 11%
Unknown 207 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 346 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 150 17%
Chemistry 38 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 1%
Other 57 7%
Unknown 244 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,423,677
of 23,666,107 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,502
of 21,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,085
of 265,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#27
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,107 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.