↓ Skip to main content

Olfactory Receptors

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Olfactory Receptors'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 CD36 Neuronal Identity in the Olfactory Epithelium
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Deorphanization of Olfactory Trace Amine-Associated Receptors
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3 (GRK3) in Olfaction
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Virus-Mediated Overexpression of Vomeronasal Receptors and Functional Assessment by Live-Cell Calcium Imaging
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Calcium Imaging of Individual Olfactory Sensory Neurons from Intact Olfactory Turbinates
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting of Olfactory Sensory Neuron Subpopulations
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Numerical Models and In Vitro Assays to Study Odorant Receptors
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 High-Throughput Odorant Receptor Deorphanization Via Phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein Immunoprecipitation and mRNA Profiling
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Patch-Clamp Recordings from Mouse Olfactory Sensory Neurons
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Vivo Electrophysiological Recordings of Olfactory Receptor Neuron Units and Electro-olfactograms in Anesthetized Rats
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Suction Pipette Technique: An Electrophysiological Tool to Study Olfactory Receptor-Dependent Signal Transduction
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Odor-Induced Electrical and Calcium Signals from Olfactory Sensory Neurons In Situ
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Long-Term Plasticity at the Mitral and Tufted Cell to Granule Cell Synapse of the Olfactory Bulb Investigated with a Custom Multielectrode in Acute Brain Slice Preparations
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Multisite Recording of Local Field Potentials in Awake, Free-Moving Mice
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 In Vivo Two-Photon Imaging of the Olfactory System in Insects
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Approaches for Assessing Olfaction in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Methods in Rodent Chemosensory Cognition
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Bioelectronic Nose Using Olfactory Receptor-Embedded Nanodiscs
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Tracking Odorant Plumes
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Generative Biophysical Modeling of Dynamical Networks in the Olfactory System
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Behavioral Assays in the Study of Olfaction: A Practical Guide
Attention for Chapter 3: G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3 (GRK3) in Olfaction
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 3 (GRK3) in Olfaction
Chapter number 3
Book title
Olfactory Receptors
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-8609-5_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-8608-8, 978-1-4939-8609-5
Authors

Sayoko Ihara, Kazushige Touhara, Ihara, Sayoko, Touhara, Kazushige

Abstract

Like in other sensory systems, adaptation is an essential process in the olfactory system, required for its proper functioning. However, the precise molecular mechanism underlying the adaptation process has not been fully understood, especially at the receptor level. Here, we describe methods to evaluate the role of GRK3, one of the members of the GRK family responsible for the desensitization of non-olfactory G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), in desensitization of olfactory receptor (OR) using a heterologous expression system. As a parameter to characterize the degree of desensitization, we measure (1) the maximal response to an agonist by either cAMP or Ca2+ imaging assay and (2) the kinetic time course for recovery to basal levels by Ca2+ imaging assay. Differences in the degree of desensitization in the presence or absence of GRK3 can be examined by comparing these parameters, leading to evaluation of GRK3.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,571,329
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,350
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,836
of 442,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#230
of 1,499 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,499 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.