You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026828 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jelte M. Wicherts, Marjan Bakker, Dylan Molenaar |
| Abstract |
The widespread reluctance to share published research data is often hypothesized to be due to the authors' fear that reanalysis may expose errors in their work or may produce conclusions that contradict their own. However, these hypotheses have not previously been studied systematically. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 706 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 141 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 85 | 12% |
| Australia | 30 | 4% |
| Canada | 21 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 21 | 3% |
| Germany | 20 | 3% |
| Spain | 16 | 2% |
| France | 11 | 2% |
| Finland | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 94 | 13% |
| Unknown | 258 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 439 | 62% |
| Scientists | 209 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 23 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 592 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% |
| Belgium | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 3% |
| Unknown | 497 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 21% |
| Researcher | 110 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 124 | 21% |
| Unknown | 63 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 175 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 62 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 60 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 120 | 20% |
| Unknown | 84 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 716. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2022.
All research outputs
#29,169
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#485
of 225,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 155,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#6
of 2,684 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,684 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.