↓ Skip to main content

Majority Rules with Random Tie-Breaking in Boolean Gene Regulatory Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Majority Rules with Random Tie-Breaking in Boolean Gene Regulatory Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudine Chaouiya, Ouerdia Ourrad, Ricardo Lima

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Engineering 4 15%
Computer Science 4 15%
Physics and Astronomy 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,464,917
of 22,821,814 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,950
of 194,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,055
of 198,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,040
of 4,870 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,821,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,870 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.