↓ Skip to main content

Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool
Published in
Microbiome, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40168-015-0092-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Flores, Jianxin Shi, Guoqin Yu, Bing Ma, Jacques Ravel, James J. Goedert, Rashmi Sinha

Abstract

Different bacteria in stool have markedly varied growth and survival when stored at ambient temperature. It is paramount to develop optimal biostabilization of stool samples during collection and assess long-term storage for clinical specimens and epidemiological microbiome studies. We evaluated the effect of collection media and delayed freezing up to 7 days on microbial composition. Ten participants collected triplicate stool samples each into no media as well as RNAlater® with and without kanamycin or ciprofloxacin. For each set of conditions, triplicate samples were frozen on dry ice immediately (time = 0) or frozen at -80 °C after 3-days and 7-days incubation at 25 °C. Microbiota metrics were estimated from Illumina MiSeq sequences of 16S rRNA gene fragments (V3-V4 region). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) across triplicates, collection media, and incubation time were estimated for taxonomy and alpha and beta diversity metrics. RNAlater® alone yielded the highest ICCs for diversity metrics at time = 0 [ICC median 0.935 (range 0.89-0.97)], but ICCs varied greatly (range 0.44-1.0) for taxa with relative abundances <1 %. The 3- and 7-day freezing delays were generally associated with stable beta diversity for all three media conditions. Freezing delay caused increased variance for Shannon index (median ICC 0.77) and especially for observed species abundance (median ICC 0.47). Variance in observed species abundance and in phylogenetic distance whole tree was similarly increased with a 7-day delay. Antibiotics did not mitigate variance. No media had inferior ICCs at time 0 and differed markedly from any media in microbiome composition (e.g., P = 0.01 for relative abundance of Bacteroidetes). Bacterial community composition was stable for 7 days at room temperature in RNAlater® alone. RNAlater® provides some stability for beta diversity analyses, but analyses of rare taxa will be inaccurate if specimens are not frozen immediately. RNAlater® could be used as collection media with minimal change in the microbiota composition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,778,030
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,089
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,531
of 271,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.