You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Population surveys of fork-marked dwarf lemurs and needle-clawed galagos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Primates, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10329-018-0669-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derick Nomuh Forbanka |
| Abstract |
Fork-marked dwarf lemurs (Phaner spp.) of Madagascar and the needle-clawed galagos (Euoticus spp.) of Central-West Africa are two genera within the primate suborder Strepsirrhini. Despite their distant relationship, these genera share remarkably convergent anatomical, behavioural and ecological characteristics. However, like most nocturnal primates in sub-Saharan Africa they are poorly studied and little is known about the population estimates of both genera. I conducted surveys of wild populations of Phaner pallescens, P. parienti and P. furcifer in Madagascar as well as Euoticus elegantulus and E. pallidus in Cameroon. Six transects were established in Madagascar covering a total distance of 20 km, within which I encountered 52 fork-marked dwarf lemurs. In Cameroon three transects were established covering a total distance of 8.5 km, and 56 encounters of needle-clawed galagos were made. Population encounter rates of P. pallescens, P. parienti, P. furcifer, E. elegantulus and E. pallidus were 3.3, 2.4, 2.3, 9.9 and 8.3 individuals per kilometre, respectively. Compared to previous estimates of population encounter rates in other study sites, these values are lower. Low population encounter rates of fork-marked dwarf lemurs and needle-clawed galagos may be due to environmental and anthropogenic pressures at the study sites. Further ecological, behavioural and conservation studies are required for these genera. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Psychology | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,980,413
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#889
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,158
of 329,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.