↓ Skip to main content

When Right Feels Left: Referral of Touch and Ownership between the Hands

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When Right Feels Left: Referral of Touch and Ownership between the Hands
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0006933
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valeria I. Petkova, H. Henrik Ehrsson

Abstract

Feeling touch on a body part is paradigmatically considered to require stimulation of tactile afferents from the body part in question, at least in healthy non-synaesthetic individuals. In contrast to this view, we report a perceptual illusion where people experience "phantom touches" on a right rubber hand when they see it brushed simultaneously with brushes applied to their left hand. Such illusory duplication and transfer of touch from the left to the right hand was only elicited when a homologous (i.e., left and right) pair of hands was brushed in synchrony for an extended period of time. This stimulation caused the majority of our participants to perceive the right rubber hand as their own and to sense two distinct touches--one located on the right rubber hand and the other on their left (stimulated) hand. This effect was supported by quantitative subjective reports in the form of questionnaires, behavioral data from a task in which participants pointed to the felt location of their right hand, and physiological evidence obtained by skin conductance responses when threatening the model hand. Our findings suggest that visual information augments subthreshold somatosensory responses in the ipsilateral hemisphere, thus producing a tactile experience from the non-stimulated body part. This finding is important because it reveals a new bilateral multisensory mechanism for tactile perception and limb ownership.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
China 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 185 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Researcher 40 20%
Student > Master 25 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 47 23%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 41%
Neuroscience 21 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Computer Science 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 31 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,955,714
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,128
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,291
of 91,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#78
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.