↓ Skip to main content

Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004001.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk T Ubbink, Hester Vermeulen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 156 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 38 24%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Psychology 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 43 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,102,491
of 15,099,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,806
of 11,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,212
of 195,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#199
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,099,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.