↓ Skip to main content

Abortion in the Structure of Causes of Maternal Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abortion in the Structure of Causes of Maternal Mortality
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, June 2018
DOI 10.1055/s-0038-1657765
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valery G. Volkov, Nina N. Granatovich, Elena V. Survillo, Leontina V. Pichugina, Zarina S. Achilgova

Abstract

 To study the structure of maternal mortality caused by abortion in the Tula region.  The medical records of deceased pregnant women, childbirth, and postpartum from January 01, 2001, to December 31, 2015, were analyzed.  Overall, 204,095 abortion cases were recorded in the Tula region for over 15 years. The frequency of abortion was reduced 4-fold, with 18,200 in 2001 to 4,538 in 2015. The rate of abortions per 1,000 women (age 15-44 years) for 15 years decreased by 40.5%, that is, from 46.53 (2001) to 18.84 (2015), and that of abortions per 100 live births and stillbirths was 29.5%, that is, from 161.7 (2001) to 41.5 (2015). Five women died from abortion complications that began outside of the hospital, which accounted for 0.01% of the total number. In the structure of causes of maternal mortality for 15 years, abortion represented 14.3% of the cases. Lethality mainly occurred in the period from 2001 to 2005 (4 cases). Among the maternal deaths, many women died in rural areas after pregnancy termination at 18 to 20 weeks of gestation (n = 4). In addition, three women died from sepsis and two from bleeding.  The introduction of modern, effective technologies of family planning has reduced maternal mortality due to abortion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 23%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Student > Master 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 31 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 30 49%