↓ Skip to main content

Advances in autoimmune myasthenia gravis management

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advances in autoimmune myasthenia gravis management
Published in
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, July 2018
DOI 10.1080/14737175.2018.1491310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuhui Wang, Iva Breskovska, Shreya Gandhy, Anna Rostedt Punga, Jeffery T. Guptill, Henry J. Kaminski

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder with no cure and conventional treatments limited by significant adverse effects and variable benefit. In the last decade, therapeutic development has expanded based on improved understanding of autoimmunity and financial incentives for drug development in rare disease. Clinical subtypes exist based on age, gender, thymic pathology, autoantibody profile, and other poorly defined factors, such as genetics, complicate development of specific therapies. Areas covered. Clinical presentation and pathology vary considerably among patients with some having weakness limited to the ocular muscles and others having profound generalized weakness leading to respiratory insufficiency. MG is an antibody-mediated disorder dependent on autoreactive B cells which require T cell support. Treatments focus on elimination of circulating autoantibodies or inhibition of effector mechanisms by a broad spectrum of approaches from plasmapheresis to B cell elimination to complement inhibition. Expert Commentary. Standard therapies and those under development are disease modifying and not curative. As a rare disease, clinical trials are challenged in patient recruitment. The great interest in development of treatments specific for MG is welcome, but decisions will need to be made to focus on those that offer significant benefits to patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 45 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 45 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,309,997
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
#457
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,602
of 331,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.