↓ Skip to main content

Inferring potential small molecule–miRNA association based on triple layer heterogeneous network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cheminformatics, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring potential small molecule–miRNA association based on triple layer heterogeneous network
Published in
Journal of Cheminformatics, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13321-018-0284-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Qu, Xing Chen, Ya-Zhou Sun, Jian-Qiang Li, Zhong Ming

Abstract

Recently, many biological experiments have indicated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are a newly discovered small molecule (SM) drug targets that play an important role in the development and progression of human complex diseases. More and more computational models have been developed to identify potential associations between SMs and target miRNAs, which would be a great help for disease therapy and clinical applications for known drugs in the field of medical research. In this study, we proposed a computational model of triple layer heterogeneous network based small molecule-MiRNA association prediction (TLHNSMMA) to uncover potential SM-miRNA associations by integrating integrated SM similarity, integrated miRNA similarity, integrated disease similarity, experimentally verified SM-miRNA associations and miRNA-disease associations into a heterogeneous graph. To evaluate the performance of TLHNSMMA, we implemented global and two types of local leave-one-out cross validation as well as fivefold cross validation to compare TLHNSMMA with one previous classical computational model (SMiR-NBI). As a result, for Dataset 1, TLHNSMMA obtained the AUCs of 0.9859, 0.9845, 0.7645 and 0.9851 ± 0.0012, respectively; for Dataset 2, the AUCs are in turn 0.8149, 0.8244, 0.6057 and 0.8168 ± 0.0022. As the result of case studies shown, among the top 10, 20 and 50 potential SM-related miRNAs, there were 2, 7 and 14 SM-miRNA associations confirmed by experiments, respectively. Therefore, TLHNSMMA could be effectively applied to the prediction of SM-miRNA associations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Master 7 19%
Lecturer 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,586,201
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#582
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,973
of 335,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.