You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Coordenação motora fina de escolares com dislexia e transtorno do déficit de atenção e hiperatividade
Revista CEFAC, June 2011
Paola Matiko Martins Okuda, Maria Dalva Lourencetti, Lara Cristina Antunes dos Santos, Niura Aparecida de Moura Ribeiro Padula, Simone Aparecida Capellini
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||19||37%|
|Student > Master||14||27%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Sports and Recreations||10||20%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||6||12%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||4||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2013.
All research outputs
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Revista CEFAC
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 112,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista CEFAC
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.