You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When is it worth waiting for? Food quantity, but not food quality, affects delay tolerance in tufted capuchin monkeys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-015-0869-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesca De Petrillo, Emanuele Gori, Antonia Micucci, Giorgia Ponsi, Fabio Paglieri, Elsa Addessi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 32% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,288,585
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,390
of 1,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,784
of 265,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.