You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding Patchy Landscape Dynamics: Towards a Landscape Language
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0046064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cédric Gaucherel, Frédéric Boudon, Thomas Houet, Mathieu Castets, Christophe Godin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,240,353
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#75,035
of 194,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,269
of 171,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,280
of 4,422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.