↓ Skip to main content

A fluoroscopy-based planning and guidance software tool for minimally invasive hip refixation by cement injection

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A fluoroscopy-based planning and guidance software tool for minimally invasive hip refixation by cement injection
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11548-015-1252-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel F. Malan, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Renata G. Raidou, Bas van den Berg, Berend C. Stoel, Charl P. Botha, Rob G. H. H. Nelissen, Edward R. Valstar

Abstract

In orthopaedics, minimally invasive injection of bone cement is an established technique. We present HipRFX, a software tool for planning and guiding a cement injection procedure for stabilizing a loosening hip prosthesis. HipRFX works by analysing a pre-operative CT and intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopic images. HipRFX simulates the intraoperative fluoroscopic views that a surgeon would see on a display panel. Structures are rendered by modelling their X-ray attenuation. These are then compared to actual fluoroscopic images which allow cement volumes to be estimated. Five human cadaver legs were used to validate the software in conjunction with real percutaneous cement injection into artificially created periprothetic lesions. Based on intraoperatively obtained fluoroscopic images, our software was able to estimate the cement volume that reached the pre-operatively planned targets. The actual median target lesion volume was 3.58 ml (range 3.17-4.64 ml). The median error in computed cement filling, as a percentage of target volume, was 5.3 % (range 2.2-14.8 %). Cement filling was between 17.6 and 55.4 % (median 51.8 %). As a proof of concept, HipRFX was capable of simulating intraoperative fluoroscopic C-arm images. Furthermore, it provided estimates of the fraction of injected cement deposited at its intended target location, as opposed to cement that leaked away. This level of knowledge is usually unavailable to the surgeon viewing a fluoroscopic image and may aid in evaluating the success of a percutaneous cement injection intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 38%
Computer Science 4 13%
Engineering 4 13%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,168,364
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#500
of 936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,841
of 270,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 936 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.