↓ Skip to main content

CADBURE: A generic tool to evaluate the performance of spliced aligners on RNA-Seq data

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CADBURE: A generic tool to evaluate the performance of spliced aligners on RNA-Seq data
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep13443
Pubmed ID
Authors

Praveen Kumar Raj Kumar, Thanh V. Hoang, Michael L. Robinson, Panagiotis A. Tsonis, Chun Liang

Abstract

The fundamental task in RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis is alignment of millions of short reads to the reference genome or transcriptome. Choosing the right tool for the dataset in hand from many existent RNA-Seq alignment packages remains a critical challenge for downstream analysis. To facilitate this choice, we designed a novel tool for comparing alignment results of user data based on the relative reliability of uniquely aligned reads (CADBURE). CADBURE can easily evaluate different aligners, or different parameter sets using the same aligner, and selects the best alignment result for any RNA-Seq dataset. Strengths of CADBURE include the ability to compare alignment results without the need for synthetic data such as simulated genomes, alignment regeneration and randomly subsampled datasets. The benefit of a CADBURE selected alignment result was supported by differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis. We demonstrated that the use of CADBURE to select the best alignment from a number of different alignment results could change the number of DEGs by as much as 10%. In particular, the CADBURE selected alignment result favors fewer false positives in the DEG analysis. We also verified differential expression of eighteen genes with RT-qPCR validation experiments. CADBURE is an open source tool (http://cadbure.sourceforge.net/).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 5%
United Kingdom 2 5%
Germany 1 3%
France 1 3%
China 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 30%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 48%
Computer Science 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#3,385,631
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#29,177
of 127,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,626
of 268,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#429
of 1,976 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,976 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.