You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-Scale Measures of Rugosity, Slope and Aspect from Benthic Stereo Image Reconstructions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0050440 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ariell Friedman, Oscar Pizarro, Stefan B. Williams, Matthew Johnson-Roberson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Seychelles | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 306 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 21% |
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 64 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 37 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 10% |
| Engineering | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,652,171
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,257
of 194,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,721
of 279,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#918
of 4,853 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,853 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.